








e-mail to a Member of Congress has the greatest impact when it is:
- From a constituent, with a name, full address, and zip code included;
- In the constituent's own words, not copied from a form letter or Web site;
- From an individual, not an intermediary organization or Web site;
- Regarding a single issue, not a group of unrelated issues;
- In an easy to read format, with a clear purpose stated in the first paragraph;
- Not attempting to begin a dialogue, which is better conducted on the phone or
in person; and
- Directed to the appropriate office: committee business to the committee, and
constituent business to the Member's personal office.
E-mail has the potential for a profound and positive impact on our democratic
system.
If effectively utilized, the public - including interest groups - could engage in a more
open and informative dialogue with their elected officials, improving communication,
and potentially reducing the cynicism and common misperceptions that currently
weaken public confidence in government. It also offers Members of Congress the
opportunity to find new ways to fulfill the Founders' dreams of a transparent,
responsive, yet deliberative, Congress. Unfortunately, grassroots activists, the
general public, and congressional offices all have misperceptions about how to
effectively use e-mail that are limiting the value of this important communications tool.
Grassroots activists' practices of encouraging and enabling citizens to send
messages to all Members of Congress are akin to flying any interested person in the
country to attend a Member's town hall meeting. The public's expectation to receive
responses from Members who do not represent them is like their showing up at the
town hall meeting and demanding to be treated like a constituent. Members'
inefficient and unresponsive e-mail practices are akin to keeping constituents
waiting in long lines for hours before letting them into the town hall meeting. Instead
of fostering democracy, these conflicting practices and expectations of all the parties
are fostering cynicism and eroding trust. This predicament requires that grassroots
activists, the public, and Congress all find new approaches to their online
communications. The Congress Online Project recommends the following.
First, grassroots activists should adopt a code of conduct to engage in electronic
lobbying practices that:
- Target individuals' own Members of Congress - and only their own Members of
Congress;
- Send meaningful messages, not "electronic postcards;"
- Avoid sending duplicate messages from the same person;
- Encourage people to speak in their own words;
- Does not foster the expectation that citizens should correspond with - and
expect a response from - any Member of Congress with whom they choose to
communicate; and
- Provide complete identification information, including name, address, zip code,
and e-mail address.
Second, citizens must recognize that congressional offices are not, and cannot be,
capable of responding electronically to every American and limit their e-mails to
communicating with only their elected representatives.
Due to the large and growing volumes of e-mail congressional offices are receiving,
electronic communication should be confined to Member-constituent
communications.
How to effectively communicate with Members of Congress electronically.
|
If you have a consumer complaint about a company which is located within the same State in which you live, File a complaint with your State's Attorney General's Office.
|
Writing a letter to share your views with the media,
government representative, agency or private
company, can be very
empowering for the Family Caregiver.
If you have an idea about how to solve a problem, or
a consumer complaint, let your voice be heard.
Some time-saving links are listed below, to help you
e-mail some of your concerns.
Scroll down below list of representatives and find
widgets for some legislation presently debated in
the House and Senate, which you may want to e-mail
your representative.
Family Caregivers are In Good Company is a website with links to articles and products on hundreds of websites on the World Wide Web. Although the sites linked to Family Caregivers are In Good Company have been reviewed and selected by family caregivers, the presence of a link does not represent an endorsement of the site by Family Caregivers are In Good Company.
|
Proposed Legislation:
Keep Medicare Fair Right now, Congress has an opportunity to enact a fair solution
to Medicare and prevent older Americans from paying even higher premiums and out-of-pocket
expenses.
Information at link above.Although they provide a form letter,
please write your own e-mail letter to your Congressman.
https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
Other Issues:
KnowledgePlex organizes and presents the most up-to-date, comprehensive collection of
publications from all of its partner organizations. By browsing or searching KnowledgePlex,
users can find highly relevant research, case studies, best practices, scholarly articles,
opinion pieces, and other material related to
the affordable housing and community development fields.
Family Care Safety Registry
Missouri's Family Care Safety Registry was established by law to protect children, elderly,
and the physically or mentally disabled in this state and to promote family and community
safety by providing background information on potential caregivers.
The job of the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board is to make sure that Recovery.gov fulfills its mandate -- to help citizens track the spending of funds allocated by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
The Board consists of Inspectors General from about ten major cabinet agencies -- including the Departments of Justice, Treasury, and Commerce -- and one of its duties will be to review the comments and questions submitted to the site Contact Recovery.gov e-mail form
|